Oct 5, 2016 · 1 minute read
Here are the odds of winning the division after week 4, per Football Outsiders (click to enlarge):
The Saints won! Their odds of winning the division increased! If you extrapolate the current trend over 16 games…the Falcons would win the division. But the Saints would be second!
The Saints started 1–3 for the second consecutive year and the third time under Sean Payton. Per our favorite record chart, the average 1–3 team finishes with about 6.2 wins on the year. That seems about right given what we’ve seen so far. About 14% of 1–3 teams make the playoffs, which is slightly less than the chances of rolling a 6 on a six-sided die. If the Saints win their next game, the odds become about 1 in 5…but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 29, 2016 · 1 minute read
Both Football Outsiders and 538 produce playoff odds every week. They results are broadly similar, but sometimes it’s interesting to compare them. Here they both are in one plot (click to enlarge):
The farther a team is from the diagonal line, the more the two models disagree. The models still disagree over Houston and Carolina, with Football Outsiders being significantly more pessimistic. With the injury to JJ Watt (which ELO doens’t know about), I suspect Football Outsiders is more in line with reality.
For fun, here’s the last 3 weeks in gif form. Obviously, it needs work, but why not?
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 28, 2016 · 1 minute read
Here are the odds of winning the division after week 3, per Football Outsiders (click to enlarge):
The Saints started 0-3 for the second consecutive year and the third time under Sean Payton. According to Football Outsiders, the Saints have about a 10% chance of winning the division. Unfortunately, that might overstate the case…per FiveThirtyEight, only about 2% of teams that start the season 0–3 make the playoffs, and 0–3 teams finish with an average of about 4.9 wins. I don’t see any reason to believe the Saints will do much better.
The Falcons, on the other hand, ascend the Mountain of Probability thanks to their in-division win on Monday. Sigh.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 24, 2016 · 1 minute read
Both Football Outsiders and 538 produce playoff odds every week. They results are broadly similar, but sometimes it’s interesting to compare them. Here they both are in one plot (click to enlarge):
The farther a team is from the diagonal line, the more the two models disagree. The models still disagree over Denver and have a pretty significant disagreement about Tennessee, as well: Football Outsiders has them at about 36% likely to make the playoffs vs. about 11% likely in the 538 model. This stuff will sort itself out over time, I suppose.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 24, 2016 · 1 minute read
Here are the odds of winning the division after week 2, per Football Outsiders (click to enlarge):
The Saints started 0-2 for the third consecutive year and the fifth time under Sean Payton (well, one was under Aaron Kromer). They’ve yet to make the playoffs after starting 0–2. Needless to say, the game against Atlanta is important.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 15, 2016 · 1 minute read
Analysis
Here are the odds of winning the division after week 1, per Football Outsiders (click to enlarge):
This isn’t a great start, but I don’t think anyone reasonable expected the Saints to compete for the division. That said, losing the first game at home to an Oakland team that was highly beatable is a bit frustrating and significantly hinders the Saints’ chance of making the playoffs at all. The Saints’ last week 1 victory was in 2013…it’s hard when you’re starting in the hole each year.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 15, 2016 · 1 minute read
Analysis
Both Football Outsiders and 538 produce playoff odds every week. They results are broadly similar, but sometimes it’s interesting to compare them. Here they both are in one plot (click to enlarge):
The farther a team is from the diagonal line, the more the two models disagree. The strongest disagreement right now is over Denver, where 538 has them about 74% likely to make the playoffs and Football Outsiders has them about 37% likely. Although Football Outsiders’ methodology isn’t 100% clear, I think this might be the difference: 538’s ELO system doesn’t know that Peyton Manning has retired, whereas Football Outsiders’ DVOA takes this into account. The same is likely the case for Carolina and Josh Norman. Another likely factor: Football Outsiders’ model bakes in some regression for both the Carolina and Denver defenses, whereas ELO doesn’t attempt to make those sorts of predictions.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 14, 2016 · 1 minute read
Analysis
In light of the news that the Saints have cut CJ Spiller, here’s a graph of NFL teams’ dead space as a percent of total cap, 2011–2016. Data from spotrac.
The other outliers in terms of dead space (Oakland & Jacksonville in 2013, Indianapolis in 2012) were part of salary cap purges and were sharp peaks before big dropoffs. The Saints should have a significant drop-off in dead space next year, though 2018 might be bad if Brees leaves.
This is how things get ugly.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Mar 1, 2016 · 0 minute read
Analysis
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
Sep 18, 2015 · 3 minute read
Analysis
It’s not shocking that the Saints lost: they were playing a better team on the road. But it would have been a nice win to have, especially because the NFC South promises to be a competitive, if not stellar, division.
Here are the Glicko rankings after week 1 of the NFL season. I seeded the 2015 rankings with mean-regressed 2014 rankings. In other words, these rankings take last year’s ranking into account, at least a little bit. Don’t forget the rankings are dumb in that they only take a few things into account: wins, losses, consistency, and opponent strength. So if Aaron Rodgers (or, more pertinently, Jordy Nelson) got hurt last week, the Packers’ Glicko rating would not change until they started losing games.
In the chart, teams with green dots are above league average, teams with grey dots are around league average, and teams with red dots are below league average, at least according to the Glicko ratings. Also note that there’s a bug in the code I used to generate this chart, so the Bengals should be green and the Jets should be grey. Sigh.
Glicko has the Saints right at league-average, in the same ballpark as the Falcons and Panthers and notably better than the Bucs. Sounds about right.
Other graphs
I’ve been playing around with a few other graphs in an attempt to analyze last week’s game. They’re all variations on the theme of how to visualize possessions and field position within a game. I’m not sure how useful they are, but here goes.
This first one I’m calling a Net Yardage chart. It shows the cumulative net yardage for the Saints: a positive net yardage means the Saints have gained more yards than their opponents, a negative net yardage means they’ve been out-gained. These graphs count punts, punt returns, and penalties, but don’t count kickoffs and kickoff returns. Check it out:
This chart shows that Arizona was fairly dominant in the first half: at no point did the Saints have more total yards than the Cardinals. That flipped quickly in the second half when Brees connected with Snead for a 63-yard gain. In all, the second half was much more even in terms of net yardage. The difference: the Cardinals scored touchdowns, the Saints scored field goals.
Here’s another chart I’ve been working on. I’m calling it a Ball Travel chart. It graphs the field position of the ball over time. Each individual line follows the ball as it moves across the field towards the Arizona end zone (marked 100 on the graph) or the New Orleans end zone (marked 0 on the graph). Once a team scores, the chart starts over. This might be more clever than it is informative, but I kind of like it. You’ll probably want to click to enlarge it:
Finally, here’s one I’m calling a Drive Chart. It’s essentially the same as the Ball Travel Chart, but it displays each drive individually, color-coded by team. The dashed grey lines represent punts. Again, maybe more clever than useful, but I’m not sure.
I’m still working on automating these, so I probably won’t produce them every week. But it’s fun to screw around.
Exclusive Week 2 preview!
The Saints are, like, way better than the Bucs. They’d better win.
---
Like what you see here? Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Your support helps keep me blogging plus, you know, kids are expensive.
